Yesterday I stayed until four o'clock in the morning reading the comments on this post . Do not ask them to do such madness, but you spend a little time to read some of the things being discussed there. If we can leave the background the aggressive tone (but do not forget, because the tone also says a lot) one can approach a discussion, which to me is crucial, the place of the DD. HH. democracy in Argentina and political tensions between real and memory construction.
comments The very long strip is basically a discussion between Martin Rodriguez and Prividera Nicholas, director of the documentary film M. Start a discussion on the entity as a transformative project Kirchner (or as another failure swallowed by the "pejotismo") and ends with trade between the two very hard about the role of memory inbreeding on DD agencies. HH. On the political use of the seventies, on the troubled construction of democracy in Argentina. I am interested to be an argument between types of the same generation, probably with similar life paths, but have very different looks for things to do with all that - I mean the political legacy of the previous generation, I mean the intimate family history also - in the context opened by Kirchner.
The generational issue more important to those born in the seventies and grew up in the Menem is to think this even if we have to think against us. Thinking, obsessively, these three stations that mark by generations: the seventies, the nineties and the present. Think about the continuities and the breaks. Thinking beyond menemismo FLACSO papers, think beyond the seventy books that we treasure in our libraries. Thinking in relation to us, today's society now.
I think the verbal violence that we read in the comments LLP is the result of all that we could not, yet we continue to build and using materials that are more venerable, now no longer useful. And so, I think, the mistake of Prividera to classify those who argue with him as "broken" or "sold to Menem." Is that par 70s-90s which still could not amalgamate into reading this account. What is Kirchner? How much of rupture was Kirchner, how much continuity with the "democratic order"? "Human Rights + twin surpluses? Does the museum is to the memory ESMA into a museum, literally, or an attempt to write another page without throwing the entire book of the past through the window?
By then pass some of the topics to be read in that post (which I will be talking about) and some we have been discussing and thinking about it enough, and, above all, we are as a generation.
comments The very long strip is basically a discussion between Martin Rodriguez and Prividera Nicholas, director of the documentary film M. Start a discussion on the entity as a transformative project Kirchner (or as another failure swallowed by the "pejotismo") and ends with trade between the two very hard about the role of memory inbreeding on DD agencies. HH. On the political use of the seventies, on the troubled construction of democracy in Argentina. I am interested to be an argument between types of the same generation, probably with similar life paths, but have very different looks for things to do with all that - I mean the political legacy of the previous generation, I mean the intimate family history also - in the context opened by Kirchner.
The generational issue more important to those born in the seventies and grew up in the Menem is to think this even if we have to think against us. Thinking, obsessively, these three stations that mark by generations: the seventies, the nineties and the present. Think about the continuities and the breaks. Thinking beyond menemismo FLACSO papers, think beyond the seventy books that we treasure in our libraries. Thinking in relation to us, today's society now.
I think the verbal violence that we read in the comments LLP is the result of all that we could not, yet we continue to build and using materials that are more venerable, now no longer useful. And so, I think, the mistake of Prividera to classify those who argue with him as "broken" or "sold to Menem." Is that par 70s-90s which still could not amalgamate into reading this account. What is Kirchner? How much of rupture was Kirchner, how much continuity with the "democratic order"? "Human Rights + twin surpluses? Does the museum is to the memory ESMA into a museum, literally, or an attempt to write another page without throwing the entire book of the past through the window?
By then pass some of the topics to be read in that post (which I will be talking about) and some we have been discussing and thinking about it enough, and, above all, we are as a generation.
0 comments:
Post a Comment