I mean, think on 28 June must not lead either to an AA meeting or a trial in Moscow revisited. Neither the foolish attitude of blaming "the mayors of the Suburbs" (on this, look at the numbers to Post conurbanos.blogspot.com) or the mythical "right turn" in a year and a half million voters have undertaken which in 2007 voted to Cristina.
The election was lost there in those millions of voters "independent" this time for various reasons chose to vote options, in my opinion, horrible but who evaluated better than this government. Thinking that the voters of De Narvaez or Civic Agreement are gorillas come out at night to write "live cancer" or that they are puppets of the Washington Consensus is not to understand anything, and is at the same time, delivered the guilty pleasure of self-pity and defeat. The Baldwin existed and it was possible to win elections with the votes of many of these people. More realistic position to think back to these areas as they do not question the structural thickness of the "model" but have distanced my fault, by wear and tear of any management and, obviously, the opposition use made of discomfort social. In politics, as in competitive sports, also plays the other.
I was thinking of pulling lines Martin on post I'm just linking below: in six years in office did not form any picture of confidence and technical competence that could replace Guillermo Moreno? And I know that Moreno became a synecdoche of the government that used to attack opposition in toto state intervention in the economy. I know. But the point is that at this point brings many more problems than advantages. At this point the permanence of Moreno (update: just give James) is a gift to the opposition.
Then follow.
0 comments:
Post a Comment